Search Mr. Robertson's Corner blog

Search Wikipedia

Search results

Showing posts with label Bible studies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible studies. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Wisdom literature in the Old Testament

Wisdom literature in the Old Testament: A comprehensive exploration

The Old Testament, a cornerstone of Judeo-Christian tradition, encompasses a variety of literary genres, among which wisdom literature holds a significant place. The wisdom books - Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Solomon - offer profound insights into human existence, morality, and the divine. This essay delves into these books, exploring their purposes, teachings, authors, relevance, and the socio-political contexts of their times.

Purpose and teachings of the wisdom texts

Wisdom literature in the Old Testament primarily aims to impart moral and practical guidance for living a righteous and fulfilling life. These texts explore themes such as the nature of God, the human condition, the pursuit of knowledge, and the principles of justice and righteousness.
  • Job: The Book of Job addresses the problem of suffering and the justice of God. It explores why the righteous suffer and questions the nature of divine justice. Job, a righteous man, endures immense suffering and questions God’s fairness. Ultimately, the book teaches that human understanding is limited and that trust in God’s wisdom is paramount, even when His ways are inscrutable.
  • Psalms: The Psalms are a collection of hymns, prayers, and poems that express a wide range of human emotions, from despair to exultation. They teach the importance of worship, the power of prayer, and the need for a personal relationship with God. The Psalms emphasize God’s sovereignty, mercy, and the hope for deliverance.
  • Proverbs: The Book of Proverbs is a compilation of sayings and instructions emphasizing wisdom, discipline, and prudent living. It provides practical advice on various aspects of life, including work, relationships, and integrity. The overarching theme is that fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and those who follow God’s commandments will live prosperous and righteous lives.
  • Ecclesiastes: Ecclesiastes takes a more philosophical approach, questioning the meaning of life and the pursuit of happiness. The author, traditionally identified as Solomon, reflects on the vanity of human endeavors and the fleeting nature of worldly pleasures. The book concludes that fearing God and keeping His commandments is the ultimate purpose of life.
  • Song of Solomon: Also known as the Song of Songs, this book is a collection of lyrical poems celebrating love and marriage. It portrays the beauty and sanctity of marital love, often interpreted allegorically as representing God’s love for His people.
Authorship and historical context

The authorship of the wisdom books is traditionally attributed to various figures:
  • Job: The authorship of Job is uncertain. Some traditions attribute it to Moses, but most scholars believe it is an anonymous work from the post-exilic period (6th-4th century BC).
  • Psalms: Many Psalms are attributed to King David, but others were written by various authors over several centuries, including Asaph, the Sons of Korah, and Solomon.
  • Proverbs: Traditionally attributed to Solomon, Proverbs is likely a compilation of sayings from different authors, including Agur and King Lemuel.
  • Ecclesiastes: Traditionally attributed to Solomon, modern scholars suggest it was written by an unknown author in the post-exilic period.
  • Song of Solomon: Also attributed to Solomon, this book’s exact origins are unclear, though it likely dates to the early monarchy or later.
The socio-political contexts of these books span from the united monarchy under David and Solomon to the post-exilic period when Israel was under Persian rule. During the monarchy, Israel experienced political stability and cultural flourishing, which allowed for the compilation and reflection on wisdom literature. The post-exilic period, marked by the return from Babylonian exile and rebuilding of the Temple, brought about a renewed focus on religious and ethical teachings.

Relevance today

The teachings of the wisdom books remain relevant today, offering timeless insights into human nature, ethics, and the pursuit of a meaningful life:
  • Job: The question of why good people suffer is as pertinent today as it was in ancient times. Job’s story encourages resilience and faith in the face of inexplicable hardships.
  • Psalms: The Psalms continue to be a source of comfort, inspiration, and guidance in worship and prayer for many believers.
  • Proverbs: The practical wisdom of Proverbs, such as the importance of hard work, honesty, and discipline, is applicable in everyday life and personal development.
  • Ecclesiastes: The existential reflections of Ecclesiastes resonate with modern readers grappling with questions about the purpose and meaning of life.
  • Song of Solomon: The celebration of love and the sanctity of marriage in the Song of Solomon offers a counter-narrative to the often secular and utilitarian views of relationships in contemporary society.
Conclusion

The wisdom books of the Old Testament are a rich tapestry of theological, philosophical, and practical insights. They address fundamental questions about God, human existence, and morality, offering guidance that transcends time and culture. Their teachings continue to inspire and instruct, providing a foundation for ethical living and spiritual reflection. Understanding the historical and cultural contexts of these books enriches our appreciation of their timeless wisdom and enduring relevance.

Thursday, April 4, 2024

Litany of Humility

Litany of Humility

By Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val y Zulueta (1865-1930), declared a Servant of God; served as Secretary of State to Pope St. Pius X (1903-1914)

O Jesus, meek and humble of heart,

Hear me.

From the desire of being esteemed,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being loved,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being extolled,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being honored,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being praised,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being preferred to others,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being consulted,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the desire of being approved,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being humiliated,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being despised,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of suffering rebukes,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being calumniated,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being forgotten,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being ridiculed,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being wronged,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

From the fear of being suspected,

Deliver me, O Jesus.

That others may be loved more than I,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That others may be esteemed more than I,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That, in the opinion of the world, others may increase and I may decrease,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That others may be chosen and I set aside,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That others may be praised and I go unnoticed,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That others may be preferred to me in everything,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

That others may become holier than I, provided that I may become as holy as I should,

Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.

Charity

Charity is patient, is kind; charity does not envy, is not pretentious, is not puffed up, is not ambitious, is not self-seeking, is not provoked; thinks no evil, does not rejoice over wickedness, but rejoices with the truth, bears with all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things (1 Corinthians 13:4-7).

To have Charity is to love God above all things for Himself and be ready to renounce all created things rather than offend Him by serious sin (Matthew 22:36-40).

Saturday, March 16, 2024

Discernment in Acts of the Apostles

Exploring Discernment in the Book of Acts as it Relates to Receiving Gentiles and Hellenist Jews into the Early Church

Aaron S. Robertson

March 2024

Introduction

The paper focuses on the Church’s process of discerning the way forward regarding key questions and disputes it encounters in the Acts of the Apostles (also known as the Book of Acts, or simply, Acts) as they relate to bringing Gentiles and Hellenist Jews into the fold. Along the way, the paper draws on both Christological and ecclesiological insights to support this discernment process. The paper’s thesis, then, is that the following passages in Acts clearly demonstrate how the early Church discerned the path forward with expanding and welcoming non-Jews and Hellenist Jews.

Four passages/pericopes will be summarized and explored. These are, in order by both chapter/verse and appearance in the paper: “The Need for Assistants”; Saul’s journey to conversion and his approval by the Apostles; Peter’s preaching to, and baptizing of, the Gentiles, and his defense of this to the Church; and the Council of Jerusalem and its effects on the Church. While there may certainly be other noteworthy passages and pericopes in Acts offering illuminating examples of early discernment in line with the paper’s thesis, space considerations for this specific study will prevent exploration beyond the four just identified.

To keep uniformity of scriptural translation, all references in the paper come from the version of the Holy Bible found at the website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), the citation of which will only be given once at the end in the Reference section. Because the paper is solely focused on Acts, only chapter and verse are given throughout, rather than citing the name of the book each time a reference to it is being made. The paper will conclude by briefly tying together analysis of the four passages/pericopes regarding discernment in line with its thesis.

Operating definitions of “discernment” for this study

Before continuing to examine the selected scripture passages, it is fitting to provide some general understanding of the word “discernment” and its variants. Keeping some sort of operating definition(s) at the forefront will help both the researcher and reader stay focused on what is attempting to be conveyed by this study. Following are three definitions taken from non-academic lay sources for “discernment.” They are: “the ability to judge people and things well” (Cambridge University Press and Assessment, 2024); “the ability to understand inner qualities or relationships” (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2024); and, the third of five definitions offered by this reference, “the trait of judging wisely and objectively” (Vocabulary.com, Inc., 2024). Taken together, the themes emerging here are judging and understanding, and this will be the author’s primary operating definition here.

“The Need for Assistants” – 6:1-7

At the center of this pericope is a growing conflict between the Hellenist Jews and the Hebrews, whereby the former are complaining that, “…their widows were being neglected in the daily distribution” (6:1), whereas, apparently, the Hebrew widows are not being neglected. Now, both groups are Jewish, but the reason why this pericope is examined in this study is because the situation here still pertains to how the Church is discerning the inclusion of those considered outsiders – being heavily influenced by Greek culture and philosophy, save for polytheism, the Hellenist Jews were often looked at by their Hebrew counterparts as being different; their Jewish identity somehow watered down, not correct, erroneous. They are, for all practical purposes, outsiders in the eyes of the Hebrews, broadly speaking.

The Apostles, wishing not to get involved in managing the daily distribution because they feel they are called to focus on prayer and the preaching of the Gospel (6:2; 6:4), instead call for the, “…select[ion] from among you seven reputable men, filled with the Spirit and wisdom, whom we shall appoint to this task” (6:3). After the seven men were chosen, they were brought to the Apostles, “…who prayed and laid hands on them” (6:6).

Identifying and selecting these seven men for this important role demonstrates considerable discernment from most notably an ecclesiological perspective. Undoubtedly, from a Christological point of view, there is a moral mandate here, insofar as Jesus would want – indeed, expect – the Church to take care of all widows. His commandment to love one another, if nothing else here, covers that. Far more prevalent in this pericope, however, is discernment over how the Church continues to grow, move forward, and best serve those in need. Here, the Apostles recognize their unique calling to a life of prayer, preaching, and leading the Church. They realize they are not called to handle this type of work, and perhaps, presumably, they do not possess the skills for, nor the interest in, this job, anyway. They judge wisely that this is not for them. So, they delegate the task out by asking that seven men of reputable character, specifically, “…filled with the Spirit and wisdom…” (6:3), be selected, and the Apostles, in turn, will formally appoint them to the role with their blessings. Going through this process enables the Church to grow by getting more people active and utilizing their own unique skillsets, talents, and interests for the betterment and welfare of the Church and those she serves.

“Saul’s Conversion,” “Saul’s Baptism,” “Saul Preaches in Damascus,” “Saul Visits Jerusalem” – 9: 1-30

Still another exemplar of discernment can be found in the conversion of Saul/Paul, and how the Church grapples with this surprising development, given Saul’s notorious reputation for persecuting believers. The opening two verses of chapter 9 are poignant in describing Saul’s hatred for the Christians: “Now Saul, still breathing murderous threats against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, that, if he should find any men or women who belonged to the Way, he might bring them back to Jerusalem in chains” (9:1-2). As he is on his way to Damascus (9:3-9) with an entourage in search of believers, Paul is blinded by a light coming from the sky and hears the voice of Jesus asking him why he (Paul) is persecuting Him. Paul remains blind for three days and does not eat or drink anything (9:9) until he is baptized by the disciple Ananias (9:10-19). Both men have visions of the other, that Ananias will come along at the command of the Lord to baptize Paul. Upon Ananias laying his hands on Paul, “Immediately things like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight. He got up and was baptized, and when he had eaten, he recovered his strength” (9:18-19).

The conversion of Paul is rich in Christological insights. For starters, the facts that Paul hated Christ and His followers, even actively participating in the martyrdom of Stephen, further reinforces, in quite a profound way here, that no one – no sin – is beyond God’s love, forgiveness, and healing. This is who God is. He is always trying to reach us, including, and perhaps especially, the most hardened of hearts. Additionally, Paul’s conversion also simultaneously demonstrates how God has a plan – a truly meaningful and profound purpose – for all. It is up to everyone to cooperate with this grace, however, and Paul here certainly discerns and responds to God’s unique plan for him. Here, not only does God forgive Paul of his horrible sins, but He specifically purposes Paul to become an apostle, that he may go out into the world, as far as he can, proclaiming the good news of Jesus Christ, the one he at one time so despised.

From both Christological and ecclesiological perspectives, Paul becomes known as the Apostle to the Gentiles. In fact, this is part of God’s unique plan for Paul, but it is also His plan for the Church, utilizing Paul’s gifts and talents, and certainly aided by His grace, to specifically work to bring non-Jews into the fold. From more of an ecclesiological aspect, Paul’s conversion also demonstrates how those in the Church wrestle with God’s call for Paul. There is certainly fear and distrust among the disciples at first (9:26), given Paul’s reputation, and it takes the trustworthy Barnabas to bring him to the Apostles (9:27) to assure them of Paul’s good intentions and faith. After hearing all this, the Apostles, “…took him [Paul] down to Caesarea and sent him on his way to Tarsus” (9:30).

Peter’s preaching to, and baptizing of, the Gentiles, and his explanation of this to the Church – chapters 10 and 11

In Chapter 10, the reader learns about Cornelius, a Roman solider who is, “devout and God-fearing along with his whole household…” (10:2) and, “…who used to give alms generously to the Jewish people and pray to God constantly” (10:2). The chapter opens with the “Vision of Cornelius,” in which the centurion is visited by an angel, who shares with Cornelius that, “Your prayers and almsgiving have ascended as a memorial offering before God…” (10:4) and instructs him to go and visit the apostle Simon Peter, who is staying in the town of Joppa (10:5). The next day, Peter has his own vision (10:9-33) preparing him for the upcoming visit by Cornelius and his men. In his vision,
He saw heaven opened and something resembling a large sheet coming down, lowered to the ground by its four corners. In it were all the earth’s four-legged animals and reptiles and the birds of the sky. A voice said to him, ‘Get up, Peter. Slaughter and eat.’ But Peter said, ‘Certainly not, sir. For never have I eaten anything profane and unclean.’ The voice spoke to him again, a second time, ‘What God has made clean, you are not to call profane.’  (10:11-15)
The following verse, 10:16, notes that this occurred a total of three times before the sheet made its way back up to the sky. Peter wrestles with the meaning of the vision, but it soon becomes apparent to him that God is talking about the Gentiles. He meets Cornelius and a small crowd of Cornelius’s “…relatives and close friends” (10:24) that Cornelius had assembled for this very special occasion of meeting Peter. Peter addresses the crowd, “You know that it is unlawful for a Jewish man to associate with, or visit, a Gentile, but God has shown me that I should not call any person profane or unclean. And that is why I came without objection when sent for. May I ask, then, why you summoned me?” (10:28-29).

At this point, Cornelius explains the vision he had and how he was instructed to summon Peter and listen to what he (Peter) has to say. Peter then gives a speech (10:34-43). Key points from Peter’s speech, for purposes of this paper, include, “In truth, I see that God shows no partiality. Rather, in every nation whoever fears him and acts uprightly is acceptable to him” (10:34-35), and, “To him all the prophets bear witness, that everyone who believes in him will receive forgiveness of sins through his name” (10:43).

While still speaking, the Holy Spirit came upon all who were present and listening (10:44), and, “The circumcised believers who had accompanied Peter were astounded that the gift of the holy Spirit should have been poured out on the Gentiles also, for they could hear them speaking in tongues and glorifying God” (10:45-46). In response to their amazement, Peter responds, “Can anyone withhold the water for baptizing these people, who have received the holy Spirit even as we have?” (10:47). After saying this, Peter then orders these Gentiles, “…baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” (10:48).

Chapter 11 opens with “The Baptism of the Gentiles Explained.” This pericope, in which Peter explains his actions to “…circumcised believers [who] confronted him, saying, ‘You entered the house of uncircumcised people and ate with them’” (11:2-3), constitutes the bulk of the chapter (11:1-18). Peter recounts his vision, explains Cornelius’s vision, and how he had, “…remembered the word of the Lord, how he had said, ‘John baptized with water but you will be baptized with the holy Spirit’” (11:16). Peter then reasons, “If then God gave them the same gift he gave to us when we came to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to be able to hinder God?” (11:17). In the end, Peter wins the Jewish believers over. “When they heard this, they stopped objecting and glorified God, saying, ‘God has then granted life-giving repentance to the Gentiles too’” (11:18).

“Council of Jerusalem,” “James on Dietary Law,” “Letter of the Apostles” – 15:1-29

The Council of Jerusalem was called to deal with a situation that arose in which there was confusion and debate as to whether Gentile converts to Christianity had to first convert to Judaism to be saved. More specifically, this controversy homed in about circumcision, with some (15:1) arguing that male Gentile converts would first need to be circumcised according to Mosaic Law to be saved. This argument appears to have come largely from Pharisee converts to Christianity (15:5). To settle this dispute, the Apostles and presbyters of the Church met in Jerusalem to discern together, with Peter (15:6-12) and James (15:13-21) addressing their brothers in faith with their arguments against the requirement for circumcising male Gentile converts to Christianity. In the end, a letter was written by the Apostles and presbyters to settle the dispute. It was written for the entire Church, with representatives selected, “…in agreement with the whole church…” (15:22) to deliver and share the letter. The ending to the letter reads:
It is the decision of the holy Spirit and of us not to place on you any burden beyond these necessities, namely, to abstain from meat sacrificed to idols, from blood, from meats of strangled animals, and from unlawful marriage. If you keep free of these, you will be doing what is right. Farewell.  (15:28-29)
It is James who makes the case for the avoidance of these meats and unlawful marriage in his address to the Council (15:13-21).

Combined analysis of Peter’s meeting with Cornelius and the Council of Jerusalem

There are considerable Christological and ecclesiological links that can be mined between Peter’s meeting with Cornelius and the Council of Jerusalem. Chapter 11, verses 2-3, in which Peter faces the, “…circumcised believers [who] confronted him, saying, ‘You entered the house of uncircumcised people and ate with them,’” is comparable to Jesus entering the homes of Jewish sinners and tax collectors and dining with them, as well. Just as Jesus Himself befriended, loved, and dined with sinners to call them to new life, Peter is doing the same here. He has discerned, through a combination of reason, the aid of his faith, and certainly with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, that Jewish sinners who are circumcised are no different – no more special, no greater than – to the Lord than Gentile sinners. Both groups are God’s children, human beings made in His image; and God desires that all His children be saved. Furthermore, it is known that Jesus, Himself, ministered to Gentiles, and certainly Peter would have remembered the words of Jesus in the Great Commission, instructing His followers to go out and make disciples of all nations. From a Christological standpoint, then, Peter’s actions meeting with Cornelius and company, and his follow-up defense of it to the Jewish believers, reaffirm that Jesus truly did come to save all humankind. He is Lord of all, Jew and Gentile, and His love and mercy are freely given to all who believe in Him.

The conclusions arrived at by the Church at the Council of Jerusalem serve to ratify Peter’s individual actions and explanation, and hence, his own Christological understanding, regarding Cornelius and his companions. The Apostles and presbyters, having assembled to thoughtfully debate and discuss – to discern, with the guidance of the Holy Spirit – together the way forward for the Church regarding Gentile converts, reason that it is not necessary for them to be circumcised in accordance with the Mosaic Law to be saved by Jesus. Indeed, it is a great hindrance. God has revealed Himself to both Jew and Gentile, and He desires that all His children be saved. As Peter states during the Council,
And God, who knows the heart, bore witness by granting them the holy Spirit just as he did us. He made no distinction between us and them, for by faith he purified their hearts. Why, then, are you now putting God to the test by placing on the shoulders of the disciples a yoke that neither our ancestors nor we have been able to bear?  (15:8-10)
In the end, as previously stated, the Council asks only of Gentile converts “…to abstain from meat sacrificed to idols, from blood, from meats of strangled animals, and from unlawful marriage” (15:29).

Conclusion

The paper attempted to make the case that the preceding four passages/pericopes in Acts clearly demonstrate how the early Church discerned the path forward in relation to its expansion and the welcoming of non-Jews and Hellenist Jews into its fold. In doing so, several rich Christological and ecclesiological insights have been mined. Christological understandings gleaned or reinforced in this study include Jesus wanting – really, expecting – the Church to take care of all widows; the fact that no one – no sin – is beyond God’s healing love and mercy; the fact that God has a unique purpose, or plan, for all; that all are God’s children, human beings made in His image, and He desires that all His children be saved; and that Jesus truly did come to save all humankind as Lord of all, Jew and Gentile, with His love and mercy freely extended to all who believe in Him. Ecclesiological observations made here include the Church learning how to get more believers active by utilizing their own unique gifts for its betterment and those she serves (specifically, the seven assistants, but also Paul); the Church correctly grappling with God’s unique calling for individual believers (specifically, Paul); and the Church correctly arriving at the conclusion after thoughtful discernment that requiring circumcision for Gentile converts would be a great and unnecessary hindrance (Cornelius, Council of Jerusalem).

Reference

Cambridge.org Dictionary, s.v. “discernment.” Accessed March 6, 2024. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/discernment

Merriam-Webster.com Thesaurus, s.v. “discernment.” Accessed March 6, 2024. https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/discernment.

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). Acts of the Apostles. Accessed March 1, 2024. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/acts/0

Vocabulary.com Dictionary, s.v. “discernment.” Accessed March 6, 2024. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/discernment.

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

A different kind of family tree - a poem

Background:

In this 11-stanza original poem turned in as an assignment in February 2024 as part of my pursuit of a master's degree in theology, I reflect on Hebrews 11 largely from the interpretation that we are all invited to join a different kind of family tree – a different kind of genealogy or pedigree, one linking us by faith and ultimately by the blood of Christ back through the Old Testament, back to the “Faith of the Ancients,” as this specific chapter/pericope is titled. I end with the universal call by Vatican II that all the faithful are called to be priests, prophets, and kings.

I chose to incorporate a rhyming scheme which follows an ABBA pattern, meaning that the first and fourth lines in each stanza rhyme, while the two lines sandwiched in the middle follow their own rhyming pattern. In my research and thought process for determining rhyming words, I relied heavily on the reference tool available at Rhyme Zone (https://www.rhymezone.com), as well as on occasional Google searches for synonyms.

“A different kind of family tree”

Inspired largely by Hebrews 11 – “Faith of the Ancients”

Aaron S. Robertson

You’re invited to be a part of this,
A different kind of family tree,
One truly as wide and adventurous as the sea,
An invite you surely don’t want to miss.

All are welcomed to join this one,
A family not necessarily all tied by blood,
It may sound strange, but it’s one united by a flood,
Come to believe in the Word, and it is done.

That comment about blood we’ll come back to a little later,
Because we do in fact all share that common link,
It was shed by the One on the cross who would save us from the brink,
By He whom on this entire earth no one can ever be greater.

An open invite to join along and receive immense grace,
He wants this for you, the question is will you say, “yes,”
You were born for greatness, so do not settle for anything less,
All your offenses and mistakes our common Father will erase.

Like all families, this one has bickering and many a fight,
All the emotions are surely here,
Joy, confusion, anger, sorrow, and fear,
There’s plenty of darkness but in the end even greater light.

Joining this lineage guarantees an audacious quest,
With the help of this your family you’ll defeat the abyss,
So that in the end you’ll know nothing but lifegiving bliss,
After all the tribulation a beautiful and eternal rest.

At times you’ll wonder how you’ll ever cope,
But do your homework as would any good sleuth,
And you’ll find here that you’re on the path to enlightened truth,
In all the trying moments, you’ll be washed over by hope.

This family already has a known beginning and end,
Wrapped in the warmth of a different kind of sun (Son),
Indeed, by He who is the promised one,
Our Father, our provider, our Savior, and our friend.

You’ll come to realize that this family is the best,
So many to look up to and emulate,
They’ll help you keep on the narrow and straight,
With their help and the mercy of our God you’ll always be blessed.

At times, you’ll suffer immensely as you walk along desert sand,
But cling to your faith on this difficult trek,
Though at times it will feel like you’re headed toward a horrible wreck,
Indeed, your destination is His promised land.

With this kind of faith, through Him you can do all things,
Mountains can move, hardened hearts softened, and walls torn down,
Martyrdom for Him, if necessary, will result in an eternal crown,
In the end, we’re all called to be priests, prophets, and kings.

Monday, February 26, 2024

Joy in Philippians

Aaron S. Robertson

When it comes to the overall theme of joy in Philippians, 4:6-7 really resonates for me as it relates to my own return to, and understanding of, the faith: "Have no anxiety at all, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, make your requests known to God. Then the peace of God that surpasses all understanding will guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus."

What greater joy can there ever be once we truly make that connection with God while still in this life? What greater joy can there ever be than truly experiencing the reality of God? Than knowing that God is in our lives, He wants to be in our lives, and He wants us to share in His life? Than knowing with absolute conviction that this life isn't all there is? That something far, far more beautiful beyond our limited comprehension awaits us, if only we give it an honest chance by trying to meet God halfway and allow Him to do the rest? I've been so wonderfully blessed to make this connection with this reality, and, indeed, there is a peace residing in my mind and deep within my heart now that cannot be explained by anything in this world.

Paul's words in Philippians 4:6-7 also remind me of Andrew's reaction portrayed in season 1, episode 4, of The Chosen, once he has met and recognized the Savior. In describing his encounter with Jesus to his brother, a skeptical and stubborn Simon Peter, the sheer joy reflected on Andrew's face and in his words really resonate. While Simon Peter is too focused on what he feels are bigger issues at that moment, Andrew, filled with joy, is trying to tell him that none of it matters.

Suffering in 2 Corinthians

Aaron S. Robertson

Paul states in 2 Corinthians 1:3-4, "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of compassion and God of all encouragement, who encourages us in our every affliction, so that we may be able to encourage those who are in any affliction with the encouragement with which we ourselves are encouraged by God."

This passage, I believe, does a wonderful job of succinctly explaining how we are each to unite our own suffering to the suffering of Christ and to one another. The passage brings the theme of suffering full circle in that our Father is always there to encourage and console us in our every struggle. In turn, as our Father is always there for us, we are able, and indeed expected, to be a source of comfort and understanding to others in their own sets of circumstances. Suffering helps each of us grow in virtue. It helps us not only to cling to God as individuals in our own unique time of need, but it also strengthens our bonds with our fellow brothers and sisters in God by helping us relate to what others are going through. As our Father shows mercy, compassion, and encouragement to each one of us, we are, in turn, equipped to do the same for others.

Paul closes the loop to this full circle in the next two verses, 2 Corinthians 1:5-6, when he writes, "For as Christ's sufferings overflow to us, so through Christ does our encouragement also overflow. If we are afflicted, it is for your encouragement and salvation; if we are encouraged, it is for your encouragement, which enables you to endure the same sufferings that we suffer."

In short, suffering brings us closer to God and to one another as fellow human beings; as fellow children of our Father adopted through Christ. One can easily see how this all ultimately relates back to our commandment to love one another - to will the best for each other.

The Call of the Disciples in The Chosen

Aaron S. Robertson

Author's note

What follows is a recent assignment (February 2024) for my New Testament class in pursuit of a master's degree in theology from Sacred Heart Seminary and School of Theology. For the assignment, we were to pretend a friend had e-mailed us after watching an episode of The Chosen (specifically Season 1, Episode 4), wanting to know what really happened when Jesus called His disciples and asking how we should account for differences in the story line among the four gospel accounts. Trying to be somewhat humorous with my love for Roman names, my imaginary friend here is named Sixtus, after five popes with that name. For reference, The Call of the Disciples is found in Matthew 4:18-22; Mark 1:16-20; Luke 5:1-11; and John 1:35-51.


Sixtus!

It’s wonderful to hear from you. It’s been a little while – I hope you’re doing well. I’d be more than happy to try to help you understand what may be going on between the four gospels and what you saw play out in the episode of The Chosen you referenced. I know one of the big questions on your mind is whether Peter really dropped to his knees crying and telling Jesus to depart from him for being such a sinful man. There’s a lot to unpack here, and I’ll certainly do my best.

Episode 4 of season 1 of The Chosen, called “The Rock On Which It Was Built,” portrays the calling of the first disciples. This event is portrayed differently in each of the four gospel accounts; in some cases, very differently. It appears that The Chosen episode attempts to blend all four accounts into one, cohesive narrative. Let’s explore this further.

To begin, Matthew’s and Mark’s accounts, while largely the same and the two that are most identical out of the four, have some subtle differences. For example, in Matthew 4:22, there is no mention of hired servants in the boat with James, John, and Zebedee. Mark 1:20 mentions the presence of hired servants. In Matthew 4:18, Simon is also called Peter. Mark 1:16 has no mention that Simon is also called Peter.

Now, Luke’s and John’s accounts are very different from Matthew’s and Mark’s, and contrast sharply from one another. Let’s begin with Luke and some of the more minor nuances within Luke as compared to Matthew and Mark. In Luke 5:1-11, Simon is referred to as or called “Simon” three times before arriving to verse 8, which then calls Simon “Simon Peter.” This may lead to some confusion for those reading this gospel account for the first time without knowing that Simon and Peter are the same person. Additionally, rather than the Sea of Galilee being the setting (as in Matthew and Mark), the setting in Luke is the “lake of Gennesaret.”

Let’s now turn our attention to the major differences in Luke compared to Matthew and Mark. Luke has Jesus teaching a crowd from the boat; instructing Simon to attempt one more catch, which, as we know, produces an overly-abundant yield of fish; dialogue from Simon that is exclusive to Luke’s telling of the account (This is where your question about Peter falling to his knees comes in); and has James and John with Simon in the same setting (instead of Jesus approaching them a little further down the road as in Matthew and Mark), specifically naming James and John as fishing partners of Simon. There is no mention of Simon’s brother, Andrew, in Luke’s account! Also, Luke mentions that James and John are sons of Zebedee, but he does not place Zebedee at the scene fishing with his sons.

John’s account (1:35-51) begins by mentioning John the Baptist and how he pointed out the Messiah to Andrew, who is a disciple of John the Baptist, along with another one of his disciples. Andrew, excited about seeing and recognizing the Messiah (Jesus), goes to tell his brother Simon all about it. This is conducive to what happens in The Chosen episode, where Andrew excitedly shares with Simon that he came across the Messiah while he was with John the Baptist. The episode does not have Simon responding enthusiastically, as we know. Simon is too focused on what he feels are bigger issues at that moment, while Andrew, filled with joy and hope, is trying to tell Simon that none of it matters – the Romans, none of it. For the Messiah has come!

Wow, hey? This is certainly a lot to take in, I know. All four gospels have differences. Some, as we see, are very different. As I said a while ago, it looks like The Chosen episode attempts to skillfully blend all four accounts into a unified, cohesive narrative. In the episode, we get Andrew joyfully sharing the good news with Simon after Andrew spots the Messiah while with John the Baptist (John’s gospel). From there, we see the major elements of Luke’s gospel play out – we see Jesus teaching a crowd from the boat; Jesus instructing Simon to attempt that one last catch; there’s the dialogue from Simon, which, again, is exclusive to Luke’s account; and James and John are with Simon in the same setting. We then turn to Matthew’s and Mark’s accounts – Andrew is in the scene, along with Zebedee, but there doesn’t appear to be the hired servants specific to Mark’s (1:20) account.

How can all this be, you’re wondering? How can there be four different versions of the calling of the first disciples, and what amounts to essentially a fifth account created for television? What really happened? Are we getting the truth? Did Simon really fall to his knees, crying and asking Jesus to depart from him for being such a sinful man? We need not fear any of the answers to these and similar questions, and here’s why.

According to the Historicity of the Gospels, a document published in 1964 by the Pontifical Biblical Commission (PBC), “The truth of the Gospel account is not compromised because the Evangelists report the Lord’s words and deeds in different order. Nor is it hurt because they report His words, not literally but in a variety of ways, while retaining the same meaning” (II. The Elaboration of the Gospel Message: Order of Treatment). Ultimately, what we must remember here, Sixtus, is that accounts of the life of Jesus, His teachings, the works of the Apostles, and so on, were originally handed down orally. It wasn’t until later that,
…many attempted “to draw up a narrative” of the events connected with the Lord Jesus. The sacred authors, each using all approach suited to his specific purpose, recorded this primitive teaching in the four Gospels for the benefit of the churches. Of the many elements at hand they reported some, summarized others, and developed still others in accordance with the needs of the various churches. They used every possible means to ensure that their readers would come to know the validity of the things they had been taught. From the material available to them the Evangelists selected those items most suited to their specific purpose and to the condition of a particular audience. And they narrated these events in the manner most suited to satisfy their purpose and their audience’s condition. (II. The Elaboration of the Gospel Message: The Four Evangelists)
Finally, I direct you to paragraph 19 of Dei Verbum, a dogmatic constitution approved and published in 1965 by the Second Vatican Council, which reads, in part:
Holy Mother Church has firmly and with absolute constancy held, and continues to hold, that the four Gospels just named, whose historical character the Church unhesitatingly asserts, faithfully hand on what Jesus Christ, while living among men, really did and taught for their eternal salvation until the day He was taken up into heaven. (Chapter V: The New Testament, para. 19)
In short, my friend, the fact that the four gospel accounts have at times very noticeable differences in details, the ordering of events, etc., is nothing to fear. We trust that the Holy Spirit guided each of the evangelists in writing down these accounts faithfully and with specific churches, audiences, and other relevant circumstances in mind. None of this detracts from the truth. The Chosen does a wonderful job of combining multiple gospel accounts into one, easy-to-understand narrative for a mass audience.

I hope this all helps, Sixtus! Great to hear from you, my friend. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to me with any additional questions or concerns you may have, and I’ll certainly do my best to address them.

All the Best,

Aaron